The World Health Organization, commonly known as the WHO, is part of the United Nations and is supposedly the leaders in international public health.
Globalists have long held a lot of weight into their opinion and direction, and matters concerning the coronavirus have been no different.
But this time they have led the cattle to slaughter- and President Trump knew it all along.
Early on in the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China, the World Health Organization tweeted a citation by Chinese health officials who “claimed there had been no human transmissions of the novel coronavirus within the country yet,” reports Fox News.
On January 14, less than two months before WHO declared a global pandemic, they tweeted:
“Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel #coronavirus (2019-nCoV) identified in #Wuhan, #China.”
These are the same Chinese authorities that have been accused over and over again of skewing data to advance their interests and protect the country’s reputation.
According to the South China Morning Post, the Chinese government knew full well that the disease was spreading from human-to-human prior to the release of the tweet.
Ten days before the tweet by WHO, on January 4, The National Review saw a statement by the head of the University of Hong Kong’s Center for Infection that read:
“the city should implement the strictest possible monitoring system for a mystery new viral pneumonia that has infected dozens of people on the mainland, as it is highly possible that the illness is spreading from human to human.”
So is it more likely that the Chinese government was not privy to this information or that they wanted to maintain a sense of control, downplaying the disease to save face?
And why did the WHO support the claims of the Chinese government without obtaining facts themselves, which apparently were easy to get?
Dr. Li Wenliang, whose life was taken by the coronavirus allegedly after he attempted to warn the world about COVID-19, blew the whistle on the virus that had similar effects to SARS.
Dr. Wenliang was later detained by the Chinese government for disturbing “social order,” according to BBC.
Despite this, the WHO made a statement on January 8 praising China’s swift reaction to the virus:
“Preliminary identification of a novel virus in a short period of time is a notable achievement and demonstrates China’s increased capacity to manage new outbreaks.”
On January 19, after the tweet about there being no evidence of human to human contact, the WHO began to backpedal a bit as more information became clear, and more importantly public.
Their revised statement, according to Fox News, read:
“Not enough is known to draw definitive conclusions about how it is transmitted, the clinical features of the disease, the extent to which it has spread, or its source, which remains unknown.”
President Trump announced on April 14 at the White House Coronavirus news briefing in the Rose Garden that the United States was cutting off all funding to the World Health Organization effective immediately.
He pointed out how they continue to put “political correctness over lifesaving measures.”
Adding, how the WHO has caused “so much death” by “severely mismanaging and covering up” the spread of the coronavirus.
This was an extremely professional and nice way to word the catastrophe that is the WHO.
But despite his etiquette President Trump was bashed for not doing more for the United States to protect the nation from the pandemic.
The WHO is the organization opposing travel restrictions on China, arguing they would ignite “fear and stigma with little public health benefit,” according to the Hill.
Our president had the forethought and bravery to enact travel bans on China, ignoring the WHO’s unintelligible advice.
Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden openly criticized Trump only hours after the statement saying the move was “hysterical xenophobia,” reports Fox News.
Even though the WHO has been behind the informational curve and reporting false facts and statements regarding the outbreak of the coronavirus, Biden wants to reinstate full funding to the organization if he is re-elected.
Hiding the transmission of the coronavirus is not the only wavering conviction the WHO has fumbled on.
They have almost continuously gone back and forth regarding whether people need to wear masks or not.
Initially the WHO fervently stated that healthy individuals don’t need to wear masks despite overwhelming international advice being to wear them in any public area.
The argument is that they provide “a barrier for potentially infectious droplets,” reports BBC.
However, some experts find no benefit to the general public wearing masks, as Mommy Underground has previously reported.
It was also touted that any personal protective equipment needed to be saved for medical personnel and not used in the private community.
According to BBC, the WHO director, general Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, recently said that:
“In light of evolving evidence, the WHO advises that governments should encourage the general public to wear masks where there is widespread transmission and physical distancing is difficult, such as on public transport, in shops or in other confined or crowded environments.”
It has been professed all along that anyone who is taking care of someone with COVID-19 or has the illness themselves should be wearing a mask to protect their own droplets from reaching others.
So now it is seemingly recommended by the WHO that we wear a mask on public transit, around people in general, and when caring for the sick; although it won’t make a difference because they are virtually ineffective.
Any statements by the World Health Organization need to be fact-checked (and not in the way Twitter does with the presidents’ statement – merely by emotional whims).
It is clear the globalist agenda of the health organization is not in the best interest of the American people, and their primary motives are to maintain lucrative trade relations.
China and the WHO attempted to twist the narrative, but our conservative collective is unraveling the truth.