Racial wars have erupted all over the nation. Various incidents have been cherry-picked by the media to portray a state of crisis.
It is unarguable racial strife exists in the world. Our reaction to these injustices, however,either promotes or degrades the problem.
Losing any life is tragic, and seeing anyone mistreated based on their skin color or beliefs is unacceptable.
It is, also, equally as morally reprehensible to exchange hate for hate and to show racism for being a victim of racism.
This is exactly the ideology being purported by a self-proclaimed expert on “the internet manifestations of racism”, as stated on her academic biography.
Jessie Daniels,Ph.D. is a sociology professor at Hunter College and City University of New York (CUNY). This week she infuriated many readers with her racist comments condemning white families.
Fox News reported:
“A City University of New York sociology professor reportedly said in a tweets torm last week that “the white-nuclear family” promotes racism, prompting a backlash on social media.”
Daniels claims during the tweets that being a white family promotes racism by default, beginning her rant with, “the white-nuclear family is one of the most powerful forces supporting white supremacy”, according to Campus Reform.
It is impossible to be racist by default. Racism requires either action, emotion, or belief. It takes shaping and conviction to form an ideology about another race.
The dictionary definition of racism is:
“prejudice, discrimination, or antagonism directed against someone of a different race based on the belief that one’s own race is superior.”
It is a logical conclusion that one’s own race would be the one most likely to support their own supremacy. However, this does not mean that this is happening.
The professor is deceivingly wording it in such a context to imply white families are merely producing members to join white supremacy activist groups.
Fox News reported:
“She reportedly tweeted: “I mean, if you’re a white person who says they’re engaged in dismantling white supremacy but … you’re forming a white family (and) reproducing white children that ‘you want the best for’ – how is that helping [and] not part of the problem?””
Shockingly, what Daniels is relaying here is that she believes in order to fight racism, white people should stop having families, and let their race die out a little bit.
This is preposterous. Not only is this extremely racist against white people, it doesn’t correct the issue at hand.
It is also an instinctual property to perpetuate your species. A simple survival instinct. We have this instinct for a reason and are designed to be fruitful, and that goes for every member of the species.
Racism is held by shallow people with shallow foresight. It is not a skin issue, but a heart issue.
Looking at an individual for their physical characteristics and not their sanctity as a purposeful human is wrong any way you work it.
The deranged professor didn’t stop there, unfortunately.
Fox News reported the additional tweets:
“Until white people are ready to confront their own family’s racism (and) participation in systemic white supremacy, it’s not getting dismantled,” she wrote. “Beyond just calling out interpersonal racism, white people who want to be engaged in the work need to ask themselves about housing wealth.”
She added: “White people: do you own your home? When you die, where’s wealth in that house going? If it’s to your children, you’re reproducing (inequality).””
It is not racist to want to pass along what you have earned to your children. Your offspring are your sole responsibility as a parent.
Most parents, regardless of race, would say that they want to do what is best for their family. To say that one race should preclude what is in the best interest of their child is highly prejudicial.
It is noted by Daniels that others have a “feminist critique of The Family as an inherently conservative force in society”, according to Campus Reform.
She attempts to portray this in a positive light, but it comes across in a sort of dark and lonely way.
If the act of having a family, a basic human instinct, is inherently conservative, then that should tell you something.
It is unnatural to push population control, same-sex unions, and other liberal agendas that aim at destroying the family unit.
After dozens of negative responses came pouring into the racist professor’s Twitter account after her rant, she decided to lock it down to prevent further criticism.
Showing such distaste for a race reflects poorly on the academic community, and shows a lack of insight into true human relation.
Please let us know in the comments section if you think Daniels’ thoughts on race have any merit to them, or if she is the one perpetuating the problem.